ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Between Alarms and Scheduling: The Effect of Cognitive Offloading on Prospective and Retrospective Memory.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Telling Students to Evaluate Does Not Make It Happen: Task Stage, Offloading Tendency, and Error Detection in AI-Assisted Student Writing.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prospective memory (i.e., remembering to complete future plans) and retrospective memory (i.e., memory for past events) are essential to daily functioning, but both are prone to everyday failures, such as forgetting to carry out an intended action (e.g., missing a medication dose) or inaccurately recalling past information (e.g., forgetting the details of a recent conversation). To mitigate these, individuals may rely on cognitive offloading, the use of physical actions or external tools to reduce retrieval effort (e.g., setting an alarm to avoid forgetting an important task). This study examined the impact of cognitive offloading on both prospective and retrospective memory, using two offloading strategies. In the first phase, 152 participants were instructed to send an email 48 h later at 7 p.m. and were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: a reminder (e.g., an alarm), a scheduled email for automatic delivery, or no reminder (internal memory). They also watched a news report. In the second phase, participants sent an email (prospective memory) and then completed a free recall question about the video (retrospective memory). Results show that both offloading conditions performed better in the prospective task. Notably, there were no significant differences in retrospective memory performance. Overall, cognitive offloading enhanced prospective memory and subjective confidence but did not influence retrospective recall, highlighting a dissociation between remembering when to act and remembering contextual information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.