ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Exploring Free Will Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Punishment in Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Meditation, free-will beliefs, and sentencing attitudes: an exploratory pilot study in India.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beliefs about free will shape how individuals judge moral responsibility and support different forms of punishment. Most research has relied on single-country samples, limiting understanding of how cultural and institutional contexts might influence these beliefs. Therefore, this study compared free will beliefs and punitive attitudes across three nations with contrasting justice traditions: Norway and Sweden, which emphasise rehabilitation and are more compatible with determinist perspectives, and the United Kingdom, which has historically incorporated stronger libertarian and retributive elements. A total of 328 participants (98 Norwegian, 115 Swedish, 115 British) completed measures of libertarian free will, determinism, and dualism, alongside a task assessing preferred severity of punishment for a hypothetical crime. The results showed that British participants scored higher on libertarian free will and dualism, whereas Norwegian and Swedish participants reported lower overall free will beliefs and selected less severe punishments. Across the full sample, stronger belief in free will was associated with harsher sentencing preferences, while associations involving determinism and dualism were more varied. These findings indicate that national context may play a role in shaping free will beliefs and punishment attitudes, suggesting that both cultural and institutional features could contribute to differences in how individuals judge responsibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.