ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Beyond the Individual: A Scoping Review of Group and Community Dimensions of Youth Empowerment.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review examines how youth empowerment is addressed beyond the psychological level, with a focus on group and community dimensions. Although empowerment theory conceptualises empowerment as a multi-level process, research has predominantly focused on individual outcomes. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science. This search identified 32 empirical studies involving adolescents aged 10 to 18, focusing on psychosocial interventions and outcomes beyond psychological empowerment. The studies were conducted across diverse contexts and mainly employed qualitative and mixed methods designs. The findings show that, at the group level, empowerment is associated with social support, collective learning and participation in decision-making. At the community level, it is reflected in civic engagement, co-design and shifts in power relations and public recognition. However, most studies continue to prioritise psychological outcomes. Groups and communities are primarily treated as contexts rather than as units of empowerment. These results indicate that group and community dimensions remain underdeveloped and highlight the need for approaches that better capture empowerment as a multi-level and relational process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.