ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Predictive Discriminant Validity of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: Incremental Prediction of Emotion Regulation Beyond Psychological Distress.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When Alexithymia Matters: Distinct Schema-Emotion Processing Profiles of Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several factor analytic investigations question whether the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) discriminates alexithymia from general psychological distress, with some researchers concluding that the difficulty identifying feelings (DIF) subscale measures distress rather than alexithymia. This debate has focused almost exclusively on structural discriminant validity (i.e., factor analytic analyses) while neglecting predictive discriminant validity, or whether alexithymia predicts clinically relevant outcomes relatively independent of distress. The present study addressed this issue using hierarchical multiple regression in a community sample enriched with participants having psychiatric histories (N = 661). Emotion regulation was assessed across three domains: global emotion dysregulation (DERS), maladaptive and adaptive cognitive strategies (CERQ), and behavioral strategies (BERQ). After controlling for depression, anxiety, and stress (DASS-21), the TAS-20-entered as its three subscales (DIF, DDF, EOT)-retained statistically significant incremental prediction across all five emotion regulation outcomes. Increments were largest for global emotion dysregulation (ΔR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.