ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Following Gastrointestinal Surgery for Cancer: How Patients Pursue Surgical Treatment.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that, after postoperative recovery from upper and lower gastrointestinal surgery for cancer, patients use peculiar modalities to describe their health. The purpose of this study is to determine how upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer surgery is considered by patients when they set their health. A structured interview was developed and 47 consecutive patients were interviewed postoperatively. Answers were analyzed through M.A.D.I.T., a quantitative and qualitative methodology that allows for the detection of discursive processes comprising the text, beyond thematic analysis. Four dimensions have been analyzed: representation of the postoperative period in daily life; use of resources; participation in achieving the clinical objective after hospital discharge; and continuing to respect the surgeons' indications. A corpus of 2374 text occurrences was analyzed. Without differences between types of surgery, surgical patients described the time after surgical intervention as a critical scenario. Patients expressed their personal opinions, expecting normality after surgery and having difficulty envisioning the future: their representation of inflexibility in the postoperative period prevented them from finding new coping strategies. Overall, across all four dimensions, participants used stabilization discursive modalities in more than 50% of cases, representative of a situation bound within strict ties and personal theories. When defining their health, cancer surgery patients tend not to consider their condition as a new and different one from before; they imagine that they will be able to fully resume their previous habits. However, this can risk undermining the achievement of the clinical objective. Thus, during early surgical consultations, as well as in surgical recovery, exploring differences after surgery and solutions could help patients in their engagement with surgical outcomes and consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.