Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352673›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Preschool Teachers' Intentions to Use GenAI: Extending UTAUT.

Chenchen Hao, Zeguo Wang, Ping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chenchen HaoFaculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.ORCID 0009-0001-6489-423X
Zeguo WangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.
Ping WangFaculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), exploring preschool teachers' willingness to adopt technology is critical for advancing their educational applications. However, this area remains underexplored. To address this gap, this study draws on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to develop a research model incorporating performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, perceived risks, and tech-savviness. Using a sequential mixed-methods design, we recruited 434 teachers to participate in a GenAI teaching-application workshop, collected 399 valid questionnaires for structural equation modeling, and conducted 15 in-depth interviews. Quantitative results indicate that performance expectancy, social influence, and tech-savviness are positively associated with preschool teachers' intention to use GenAI, while perceived risk is negatively associated; effort expectancy and facilitating conditions show no significant association. Due to methodological limitations including high inter-construct correlations and potential common method bias, these findings should be viewed as exploratory rather than conclusive. Qualitative interviews support these relationships and provide further explanatory insights. The mixed-methods results offer preliminary hypotheses regarding GenAI adoption among preschool teachers, and future confirmatory research is needed to verify their generalizability, especially in collectivist cultural contexts.

Indexed as

behavioral intentionsgenerative artificial intelligencepreschool teachersUTAUT model

Identifiers

PMID42352673
PMCPMC13295781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.