ArticleBrain sciences2026
Synaptic Inputs to OFF Parasol Ganglion Cells in Macaque Retina: An Analysis Using Serial Blockface Scanning Electron Microscopy.
Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesGanglion cells are the projection neurons of the retina, and there are multiple types that differ in their morphology, light responses and central projections. Parasol cells are one of the major retinal ganglion cell types in primates. The presynaptic bipolar cells have been well-characterized, but less is known about the amacrine cells that provide the majority of their inputs. The goal of this study was to identify the amacrine cells presynaptic to the OFF subtype of parasol cells.
methodsCentral retinal tissue from an adult macaque was processed for serial block-face scanning EM, and a volume of images of the inner retina located 2 mm temporal to the center of the fovea was analyzed.
resultsAll the OFF parasol cells in the volume were reconstructed. All the synaptic inputs of two OFF parasol cells were analyzed. They received 80% or more of their input from amacrine cells and the remainder from bipolar cells, almost entirely from the Off diffuse type. Many of the presynaptic amacrine cells were reconstructed sufficiently to be classified as wide-field or narrow-field, and the latter type predominated. Five specific types of presynaptic amacrine cells were identified as AII, A4, knotty bistratified type 1, A13 and wiry type 1. Notably, the same types of amacrine cells are also presynaptic to OFF midget ganglion cells, another major type.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that differences between the light responses of midget and parasol ganglion cells likely arise from differences in the presynaptic bipolar cell types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.