ReviewBrain sciences2026
Neonatal Epilepsy: Beyond Seizures in a Developing Brain-A Narrative Review.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal seizures represent the most common neurological emergency in the neonatal period and arise within a uniquely immature and highly dynamic brain. Their recognition is challenging due to frequent electroclinical dissociation, with many seizures remaining purely electrographic and therefore detectable only through continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring. This narrative review provides an integrated and updated overview of neonatal seizures, bridging developmental neurobiology, diagnostic challenges, etiological classification, and therapeutic strategies. The immature brain is characterized by an imbalance between excitation and inhibition, transient network architectures, and activity-dependent developmental processes, all of which contribute to the distinct electroclinical features of neonatal seizures. cEEG remains essential for accurate diagnosis and quantification of seizure burden, which may influence outcome. Etiology represents the primary determinant of prognosis, with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), stroke, and genetic disorders among the most frequent causes. Advances in genetic testing have improved diagnostic precision and enabled targeted therapies in selected cases, supporting a precision medicine approach. Several key findings emerge from the current evidence base: (i) the neonatal brain is a developmentally constrained system in which excitation-inhibition imbalance, transient circuits and immature long-range connectivity shape an electroclinically distinct seizure phenotype; (ii) cEEG is the gold standard for detection and quantification of seizure burden, since the majority of neonatal seizures are electrographic-only and bedside clinical recognition systematically underestimates true seizure burden; (iii) etiology-chiefly HIE, stroke, and genetic causes-remains the strongest determinant of outcome, while seizure burden acts as an independent and potentially modifiable prognostic modifier; (iv) phenobarbital retains an evidence-based advantage in acute electrographic seizure control, whereas levetiracetam offers a favorable safety profile in the absence of robust long-term human neurotoxicity data; (v) rapid genomic diagnostics, artificial intelligence-assisted EEG analysis and multimodal neuromonitoring are converging toward a precision-neonatology framework, but their translation into routine practice requires validation, standardization, and equitable access. Future neonatal seizure care should extend beyond seizure control to the preservation and optimization of neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.