ReviewBrain sciences2026
Updates in Management of Acute Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Injury.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic injury is one of the most common causes of disorders of consciousness (DoC) worldwide, but the management and prognosis of DoC remain enigmatic. The uncertainty surrounding the natural course of DoC, the tendency of consciousness to wax and wane, and a lack of effective treatments outside of avoiding additional insults renders trauma-associated DoC complex for both providers and patient surrogates to navigate. This review explores the acute clinical course of DoC after traumatic injury chronologically and aims to compile recommendations based on the current best practices for diagnosis, management, and prognostication when caring for these patients during their acute hospitalization. Updates from trauma and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) resources, such as the American College of Surgeons, as well as new recommendations in the field of DoC are summarized. Serial clinical assessment with a standardized neurobehavioral battery such as the CRSR-FAST remains the mainstay of clinical care and research for DoC. Accurate diagnosis, multifaceted management, and humility surrounding prognostic discussions are all critical to caring for patients with DoC after trauma. Most of the care for trauma patients with a DoC remains supportive and aimed at avoiding secondary insults while allowing time for the patient's recovery. In the same way that clinical care focuses on a cycle of diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis with each providing insight for the next, ongoing and future DoC research will compound on itself and hopefully lead to more advances in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.