ReviewBrain sciences2026
Hybrid Evidence-Informed Synthesis of Resting-State Functional Connectivity Alterations in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is frequently followed by persistent cognitive, affective, and sensory complaints despite unremarkable conventional structural imaging. Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) has been increasingly employed to detect subtle alterations in large-scale brain networks. However, variability in analytical approaches and the potential influence of neurovascular factors complicate interpretation of BOLD-derived connectivity findings.
objectiveThis study provides a focused, evidence-informed synthesis integrating umbrella review principles with a targeted narrative analysis of recent high-quality rs-fMRI studies in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Rather than a comprehensive systematic review, the aim was to identify convergent patterns of network dysfunction while critically examining methodological constraints, including neurovascular confounds and variability in analytical approaches.
conclusionsThis synthesis supports a network-level model of mTBI characterized by distributed connectivity disturbances. However, given the limited number of eligible studies and substantial methodological heterogeneity, findings should be interpreted as qualitative convergence rather than quantitative generalization. Future longitudinal, multimodal, and standardized imaging approaches are required to clarify the translational relevance of rs-fMRI findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.