ReviewCancers2026
Artificial Intelligence and the Evolving Paradigm of Lung Cancer Management.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, largely due to late-stage diagnosis, biological heterogeneity, and persistent challenges in staging and treatment selection. This narrative review summarizes current and emerging applications of AI across lung cancer screening and early detection, imaging-based staging and prognostication, tissue and liquid biopsy-based tumor characterization, treatment planning, surgical and intraoperative guidance, and drug discovery. In imaging, deep learning models have demonstrated high performance in pulmonary nodule detection, risk stratification, and prediction of molecular alterations, while also showing promise in improving screening efficiency and reducing interpretive variability. In pathology and liquid biopsy domains, AI enables prediction of driver mutations, immunotherapy response, and survival outcomes directly from histopathology slides, circulating tumor DNA, and other blood-based biomarkers, facilitating minimally invasive precision oncology approaches. In treatment planning and delivery, AI systems are being developed to support clinical decision-making, surgical planning (through advanced image segmentation and delineation of operative anatomy), and intraoperative navigation through robotic and computer vision-enabled platforms. Despite these advances, significant barriers remain, including limited real-world validation, algorithmic biases, workflow integration issues, and unresolved ethical and legal concerns. Future progress will depend on the development of transparent, clinically validated, and generalizable AI systems that augment rather than replace the expertise of clinical providers and healthcare teams. Active engagement from pulmonologists, oncologists, radiologists, and thoracic surgeons will be essential in guiding safe implementation and ensuring that AI-driven innovations translate into meaningful improvements in patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.