Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352510›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Neoadjuvant Therapy and the Evolving Management of Resectable Advanced Melanoma.

Nikolaos Papadopoulos, Michele Del Vecchio, Andrea Spagnoletti, Jacopo Pigozzo, Luisa Piccin, Alessandro Minisini, Federico Pravisano, Gabriele Roccuzzo, Paolo Fava, Carolina Cimminiello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nikolaos PapadopoulosDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy.
Michele Del VecchioUnit of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9060-2512
Andrea SpagnolettiUnit of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5293-1849
Jacopo PigozzoMedical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-8915
Luisa PiccinMedical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5148-4637
Alessandro MinisiniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Academic Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7712-7286
Federico PravisanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Academic Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), 33100 Udine, Italy.
Gabriele RoccuzzoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7126-5506
Paolo FavaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-7458
Carolina CimminielloDivision of Clinical and Experimental Oncology and Melanoma Immunotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-4219-4868

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma has long represented a unique challenge in oncology. In its early stages, it can often be cured with surgery alone, resulting in excellent survival outcomes. Its biology is complex and heterogeneous, often including mutations such as BRAF and NRAS, which partly explain its high immunogenicity but also its capacity to relapse. For many decades, the standard approach in resectable stage III melanoma was surgery first, followed by adjuvant therapy. In the last decade, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors created the opportunity to treat patients before surgery. The neoadjuvant approach is based on the hypothesis that treatment of the intact tumor may enhance antitumor immune priming and activation. The first prospective neoadjuvant studies, including OpACIN and OpACIN-neo, showed high pathological response rates with ipilimumab plus nivolumab and introduced pathological response as an early marker of long-term benefit. The PRADO study showed that treatment response could guide the extent of surgery required. The SWOG S1801 trial demonstrated better event-free survival with perioperative pembrolizumab compared to adjuvant therapy alone. Lastly, the phase III NADINA trial showed that neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by response-adapted adjuvant therapy significantly improves outcomes. Biomarkers such as PD-L1, IFN-γ signature, tumor mutational burden and imaging (PET scan) appear promising to predict response, but none have been sufficiently validated for routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

biomarkersNADINAneoadjuvant therapyPRADO

Identifiers

PMID42352510
PMCPMC13297231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.