Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352491›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Functional Recovery as a Survivorship Endpoint in Early-Stage NSCLC.

Giovanni Leuzzi, Filippo Lococo, Beatrice Cosentino, Federica Sabia, Michele Ferrari, Alessandro Pardolesi, Alessia Stanzi, Jury Brandolini, Luigi Rolli, Matteo Calderoni and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giovanni LeuzziDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2773-0524
Filippo LococoUnit of Thoracic Surgery, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Beatrice CosentinoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Federica SabiaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Michele FerrariDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2661-9317
Alessandro PardolesiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7037-402X
Alessia StanziDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8569-650X
Jury BrandoliniDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5505-8758
Luigi RolliDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6673-5785
Matteo CalderoniDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Clarissa UslenghiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Piergiorgio SolliDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4890-2578

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in screening, surgical techniques, perioperative care, and multimodality treatment have progressively expanded the population of long-term survivors with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, disease-free survival does not necessarily correspond to complete functional recovery after curative-intent treatment. Many patients continue to experience persistent fatigue, dyspnea, reduced physical activity, impaired exercise tolerance, muscle loss, and deterioration in health-related quality of life despite adequate oncologic control. This narrative review discusses functional recovery as a survivorship endpoint in early-stage NSCLC, focusing on recovery trajectories, physiologic vulnerability, frailty, sarcopenia, rehabilitation, symptom burden, and emerging biologic frameworks such as allostatic load. Increasing evidence suggests that survivorship after NSCLC should not be interpreted exclusively according to recurrence or survival metrics, but also according to the ability to recover physiologic reserve, autonomy, and daily functioning after treatment. Functional recovery appears heterogeneous and influenced by multiple interacting factors, including baseline reserve, systemic inflammation, physical inactivity, behavioral adaptation, and cumulative stress burden. Rehabilitation strategies, structured symptom surveillance, and patient-reported outcomes may help identify vulnerable patients and improve long-term survivorship trajectories. Future survivorship models should probably integrate oncologic outcomes with longitudinal functional assessment to better characterize recovery patterns after treatment.

Indexed as

allostatic loadearly-stage NSCLCfunctional recoverypatient-reported outcomesquality of lifesurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID42352491
PMCPMC13297271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.