ReviewCancers2026
Functional Recovery as a Survivorship Endpoint in Early-Stage NSCLC.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in screening, surgical techniques, perioperative care, and multimodality treatment have progressively expanded the population of long-term survivors with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, disease-free survival does not necessarily correspond to complete functional recovery after curative-intent treatment. Many patients continue to experience persistent fatigue, dyspnea, reduced physical activity, impaired exercise tolerance, muscle loss, and deterioration in health-related quality of life despite adequate oncologic control. This narrative review discusses functional recovery as a survivorship endpoint in early-stage NSCLC, focusing on recovery trajectories, physiologic vulnerability, frailty, sarcopenia, rehabilitation, symptom burden, and emerging biologic frameworks such as allostatic load. Increasing evidence suggests that survivorship after NSCLC should not be interpreted exclusively according to recurrence or survival metrics, but also according to the ability to recover physiologic reserve, autonomy, and daily functioning after treatment. Functional recovery appears heterogeneous and influenced by multiple interacting factors, including baseline reserve, systemic inflammation, physical inactivity, behavioral adaptation, and cumulative stress burden. Rehabilitation strategies, structured symptom surveillance, and patient-reported outcomes may help identify vulnerable patients and improve long-term survivorship trajectories. Future survivorship models should probably integrate oncologic outcomes with longitudinal functional assessment to better characterize recovery patterns after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.