ReviewCancers2026
Systemic Therapy for Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advanced-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) represents one of the major success stories in modern oncology, with long-term survival now exceeding 80% for most patients. In this review, we examine the evolution of frontline therapy for advanced-stage cHL, tracing the transition from empiric combination chemotherapy to contemporary, biologically informed treatment strategies. We begin by revisiting the early development of multiagent chemotherapy regimens, including MOPP and ABVD. These regimens established, for the first time, that advanced lymphoma could be cured with systemic therapy. We then discuss efforts to improve outcomes through treatment intensification, which culminated in the development of BEACOPP-based approaches that improved disease control at the cost of substantial acute and long-term toxicity. Subsequently, the incorporation of functional imaging ushered in the era of PET-adapted therapy, enabling dynamic treatment modification based on early response and providing a framework to better balance efficacy with toxicity reduction. Finally, we review the integration of novel agents, including brentuximab vedotin and PD-1 blockade, which have reshaped the frontline treatment landscape and further improved outcomes for high-risk patients while challenging historical chemotherapy paradigms. Collectively, the treatment history of advanced-stage cHL reflects a broader evolution in oncology: from maximizing cytotoxic intensity toward increasingly personalized strategies designed to optimize cure while minimizing long-term harm. Ongoing efforts focused on biomarker-driven risk stratification and the utilization of circulating tumor DNA are poised to further refine this balance in the coming decade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.