ReviewCancers2026
Intraoperative Nodule Localization in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Existing and Emerging Techniques.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Intraoperative Molecular Imaging in Thoracic Oncology: Expanding the Observable Disease Space.Cancers · 2026Review
- CT-guided Preoperative Localization of Impalpable Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison Between Two Devices.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As thoracic surgeons more frequently address smaller lung lesions and perform lung-sparing resections, their objective is to resect an adequate specimen and margin without removing excess healthy lung tissue. Although perioperative lung nodule localization has been in practice for decades, the existing and emerging techniques used for the identification of targeted and occult lesions are more widely utilized today than they were in the past. In this review, we detail the logic behind this increase in use, classify the techniques into preoperative and intraoperative categories, and define the specific modalities available. Where applicable, we review the published data comparing techniques, detailing efficacy and safety. In the preoperative space, we describe standard computed tomography (CT)-guided localization, virtual-assisted lung mapping, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, robotic-assisted bronchoscopy, and novel fiducial markers. In the intraoperative space, we describe classical localization techniques, novel applications of intraoperative cone-beam CT, and fluorescence-guided surgery and intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI). Lastly, we review emerging approaches for intraoperative molecular imaging including a report on agents in early-stage clinical trials and a brief survey of promising preclinical models. With each approach mentioned, we analyze the potential benefits and hazards, and appraise the evidence for (or against) the use of any specific modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.