ArticleCancers2026
Durvalumab with Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGemcitabine, cisplatin and durvalumab or pembrolizumab are standard first-line treatments for advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC). Older patients with BTC may be frail or have contraindications to cisplatin. At our institution, oxaliplatin has been used as an alternative to cisplatin.
methodsIn this evaluation, we report the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine with oxaliplatin and durvalumab as a first-line treatment of BTC. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included time to progression (TTP), disease control rate (DCR), and the incidence of treatment-related toxicities.
resultsTwenty-nine patients were included. The majority were Caucasian (97%) and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1 (97%). Median age was 72 years old. Sixty-six percent had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Baseline renal insufficiency and/or hearing impairment were the most common reasons for cisplatin contraindication. Median follow-up was 20.6 months. Treatment cycles were every 28 days with durvalumab (1500 mg) given on day 1 and gemcitabine (range 600 mg/m
conclusionsOxaliplatin, in combination with durvalumab and gemcitabine, is a suitable platinum substitute for advanced BTC patients when cisplatin is contraindicated. Our analysis showed similar efficacy and no new safety concerns. Given the small sample size, our analysis is hypothesis-generating and calls for a larger prospective analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.