Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352377›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2026

Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Perspectives.

Walter Giuseppe Giordano, Ludovica Pepe, Canio Martinelli, Valeria Zuccalà, Giuliana Ciappina, Massimiliano Berretta, Giuseppe Giuffrè, Vincenzo Fiorentino, Antonio Ieni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Walter Giuseppe GiordanoPhD Program in Translational Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-8530-2474
Ludovica PepePhD Program in Translational Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Canio MartinelliUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0587-8467
Valeria ZuccalàAnatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3478-9217
Giuliana CiappinaSection of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0813-3126
Massimiliano BerrettaMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9837-9148
Giuseppe GiuffrèAnatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Vincenzo FiorentinoPhD Program in Translational Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1132-1761
Antonio IeniAnatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2878-3572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries and remains challenging in terms of risk stratification, treatment monitoring, and early detection of recurrence. Liquid biopsy provides a minimally invasive approach for the dynamic assessment of tumor-derived biomarkers and may complement tissue-based diagnosis and molecular classification. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on circulating biomarkers in endometrial cancer, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), circulating microRNAs, and tumor-educated platelets, with attention to validity, applicability, and implementation barriers. Among these biomarkers, ctDNA currently has the strongest evidence base, especially for longitudinal monitoring, prognostic stratification, molecular residual disease assessment, and early detection of relapse in high-risk or recurrent disease. However, its sensitivity remains limited in early-stage, low-volume, and low-shedding tumors. CTCs, EVs, microRNAs, and platelet-derived signatures are promising but still largely investigational. Artificial intelligence may support multimodal biomarker validation, although clinical adoption will require external validation, locked algorithms, standardized workflows, and prospective utility trials. Overall, liquid biopsy represents a promising adjunct to tissue-based diagnosis and molecular classification in endometrial cancer, particularly for monitoring and follow-up. Prospective studies are now needed to demonstrate whether liquid-biopsy-informed decisions can improve outcomes or safely reduce overtreatment.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEndometrial NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNAExtracellular VesiclesFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMicroRNAsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAMicroRNAsartificial intelligencecirculating tumor cells (CTCs)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)clinical trialsendometrial cancerextracellular vesicles (EVs)liquid biopsymicroRNAsprecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID42352377
PMCPMC13297336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.