ReviewBiomolecules2026
Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Perspectives.
Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries and remains challenging in terms of risk stratification, treatment monitoring, and early detection of recurrence. Liquid biopsy provides a minimally invasive approach for the dynamic assessment of tumor-derived biomarkers and may complement tissue-based diagnosis and molecular classification. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on circulating biomarkers in endometrial cancer, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), circulating microRNAs, and tumor-educated platelets, with attention to validity, applicability, and implementation barriers. Among these biomarkers, ctDNA currently has the strongest evidence base, especially for longitudinal monitoring, prognostic stratification, molecular residual disease assessment, and early detection of relapse in high-risk or recurrent disease. However, its sensitivity remains limited in early-stage, low-volume, and low-shedding tumors. CTCs, EVs, microRNAs, and platelet-derived signatures are promising but still largely investigational. Artificial intelligence may support multimodal biomarker validation, although clinical adoption will require external validation, locked algorithms, standardized workflows, and prospective utility trials. Overall, liquid biopsy represents a promising adjunct to tissue-based diagnosis and molecular classification in endometrial cancer, particularly for monitoring and follow-up. Prospective studies are now needed to demonstrate whether liquid-biopsy-informed decisions can improve outcomes or safely reduce overtreatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.