SynthesisBiomolecules2026
Material Properties of Composite Resins Used for Orthodontic Attachments in Clear Aligner Therapy: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clear aligner therapy has become increasingly widespread in contemporary orthodontics, relying on composite resin attachments to enhance force transmission and improve the predictability of tooth movement. The physicochemical and mechanical properties of these biomaterials play a crucial role in attachment durability, dimensional stability, and esthetic performance during treatment. This systematic review aimed to evaluate how different composite resin types influence the mechanical, optical, and functional performances of orthodontic attachments used in clear aligner therapy. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for studies published between 2015 and 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. In vitro studies and clinical trials evaluating composite resins used for attachment fabrication were included. Fifteen studies met the eligibility criteria, including eleven laboratory investigations and four clinical studies. The evaluated outcomes comprised shear bond strength, wear resistance, surface roughness, microhardness, color stability, and accuracy of attachment reproduction. Overall, all evaluated composite resins demonstrated shear bond strength values within clinically acceptable ranges. However, significant differences were observed in the material performances depending on the resin composition and viscosity. Nanohybrid and high-viscosity composite resins were generally associated with improved mechanical resistance, reduced wear, and greater dimensional stability, although SBS outcomes should be interpreted in light of the bonding protocols used. In contrast, flowable composite resins showed improved handling and adaptation to attachment molds but presented higher susceptibility to surface degradation and discoloration. The findings suggest that the composition and properties of composite resins significantly influence the mechanical and optical behavior of orthodontic attachments. Optimizing material selection according to biomechanical demands and esthetic requirements may improve attachment longevity and treatment predictability in clear aligner therapy. Clinicians should prioritize nanohybrid or high-viscosity composite resins for high-load attachments and use flowable composite resins materials when adaptation and esthetics are critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.