Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352209›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Automated Working Alliance Assessment in Psychological Counseling Using Gemini and XGBoost.

Yuexi Li, Ningtao Sun, Zhuoxi Mai, Dalin Li, Guifang Fu, Xueling Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuexi LiCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Ningtao SunSchool of Computer Science, Zhuhai College of Science and Technology, Zhuhai 519041, China.
Zhuoxi MaiSchool of Computer Science, Zhuhai College of Science and Technology, Zhuhai 519041, China.
Dalin LiSchool of Computer Science, Zhuhai College of Science and Technology, Zhuhai 519041, China.
Guifang FuDepartment of Applied Psychology, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Xueling YangDepartment of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8403-6833

Funding

Engineering Technology Research Center of Guangdong Provincial Key Scientific Research Platform Project 2024GCZX001Guangdong Key Disciplines Project 2022ZDJS139National Natural Science Foundation of China 62372494National Undergraduate Training Program on Innovation and Entrepreneurship 202313684003SZhuhai Industry-University Research Project 2220004002671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Session dialogue assessment based on machine learning is gradually becoming an effective solution for therapeutic alliance measurement which is an important factor for successful psychotherapy. However, most existing models assume clean and pre-structured dialogue transcripts, whereas real-world counseling documentation often contains heterogeneous case reports. This gap limits the applicability of current automated assessment models in realistic documentation scenarios. In this work, we propose a framework for automated working alliance assessment from complex, multilingual reports. First, language-specific BERT models are fine-tuned to process case reports across different languages, enabling accurate speaker role delineation and dialogue structuring. Second, Gemini-2.5-Flash is leveraged to annotate the dialogues with working alliance ratings. Third, a hybrid feature representation strategy is then developed to jointly capture linguistic style and semantic content from the counseling dialogues. Furthermore, an entropy-based mutual information analysis is conducted to identify the most informative linguistic features. Finally, the extracted hybrid features serve as inputs to XGBoost for alliance assessment. In experiments, the proposed framework shows better performance in the comparison with SOTA methods and generalization ability.

Indexed as

Gemini-2.5-Flashhybrid feature representationpsychological counselingworking allianceXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42352209
PMCPMC13297900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.