Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352199›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Coupling Divergence Under Regime Switching: A Methodology for Structural Systemic Risk in Heterogeneous Subsystems.

Marin Pamukov, Nikolay Hinov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marin PamukovCoE "National Center of Mechatronics and Clean Technologies", 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0009-0006-1596-3856
Nikolay HinovCoE "National Center of Mechatronics and Clean Technologies", 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-0308-4858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystemic risk in heterogeneous multi-subsystem settings has been addressed by composite stress indices, spectral entropy of correlation matrices, and regime-switching copula models; none directly measures structural divergence between regime-conditional coupling matrices under an explicit hidden-regime model.

methodsWe embed whitened subsystem indicators in a two-regime Gaussian-copula hidden Markov process and define the coupling divergence as the matrix relative entropy between regime-conditional correlation matrices. We establish non-negativity, reduction to scalar Kullback-Leibler divergence between sorted eigenvalue distributions under commutativity, orthogonal invariance, and vanishing under the no-regime-switching null.

resultsOn stylized simulation, the framework separates regime-switching from single-regime null cases at an operating window T ∈ [250, 1000]; it isolates eigenbasis-rotation signals invisible to any sorted-eigenvalue method, with 99.9% of the divergence in the rotation regime residing in the non-commutative component; it tolerates Gaussian-copula misspecification under heavy-tailed processes with a quantifiable upward bias; and expectation-maximization convergence behavior serves as an auxiliary null-identification diagnostic.

conclusionsThe framework composes existing primitives into a regime-to-regime structural divergence and isolates a compositional mode of regime change beyond scalar methods. Results are internal-validity claims on synthetic data; external validation on real multi-subsystem data is an open question.

Indexed as

coupling divergenceeconophysicseigenbasis rotationGaussian copulaheterogeneous subsystemshidden Markov modelmatrix relative entropyregime switchingstructural entropysystemic risk

Identifiers

PMID42352199
PMCPMC13297826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.