ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
AMGAA: Attention-Guided Multi-Target Generative Adversarial Attack for Vision Transformers.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vision Transformers (ViTs) have achieved strong performance in computer vision, but their adversarial robustness remains underexplored. Existing ViT-oriented attacks mainly rely on iterative optimization, leading to high generation cost and limited transferability. Moreover, most generative attacks target a single class, making them inefficient for multi-target scenarios. To address these issues, we propose Attention-Guided Multi-Target Generative Adversarial Attack (AMGAA). AMGAA leverages ViT self-attention to guide target feature fusion and adaptively selects important source patches for perturbation generation. It jointly optimizes adversarial, attention constraint, and total variation losses to improve targeted attack success while preserving visual naturalness. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet show that AMGAA achieves average attack success rates (ASRs) of 43.2% and 39.0% in ImageNet single-target transfer attacks and CIFAR-10 multi-target attacks, respectively. Compared with the generative attack methods evaluated in our experiments, AMGAA improves ASR by 5.7 percentage points in the multi-target setting and by 8.1 percentage points in unknown-class generalization. AMGAA also obtains a low LPIPS of 0.018, indicating good visual imperceptibility. Ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of its key components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.