ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Entropy Gap as a Measure of Epistemic Caution in Credal Sets Generated from Data.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imprecise probability models generated from data represent epistemic uncertainty by replacing the precise empirical distribution with a set of compatible probability distributions. When this set is described by reachable probability intervals, the induced bounds are tight, so the represented imprecision is not inflated by unattainable interval limits. This paper studies the informational effect of this replacement through the epistemic entropy gap, defined as the difference between the maximum entropy over the induced credal set and the Shannon entropy of the empirical distribution. The gap is a differential quantity: it measures the additional uncertainty introduced by the imprecise model beyond the observed frequencies. We analyze it for three reachable interval models generated from multinomial data: the Imprecise Dirichlet Model, the ϵ-contamination model and the approximated Non-Parametric Predictive Inference model. The analysis covers its main properties, its asymptotic behavior and its role in entropy equivalent calibration of model parameters. The results show that the entropy gap offers a common informational scale for comparing how different imprecise models represent the same empirical evidence, and helps interpret the degree of caution associated with limited data reliability and with empirical distributions that may otherwise lead to overconfident uncertainty assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.