ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Beyond KEAP1: The Context-Specific NRF2 Partner Code in Disease and Therapy.
Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) has traditionally been framed as a Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1)-regulated stress-response transcription factor, but three observations now require a broader framework: NRF2 turnover is controlled by parallel E3 ligase systems; transcriptional output can be limited by coactivator assembly despite unchanged NRF2 abundance; and NRF2 activation can be beneficial or harmful depending on disease context, as illustrated by lung cancer models in which NRF2 paradoxically promotes metastasis through BTB and CNC homology 1 (BACH1) stabilization. We synthesize these observations into an NRF2 partner-code framework in which NRF2 acts as a context-dependent transcriptional platform assembled through four partly independent modules: a degradation module (KEAP1; β-transducin repeat-containing protein, β-TrCP; HMG-CoA reductase degradation protein 1/synoviolin 1, Hrd1/SYVN1; WD repeat-containing protein 23/DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor 11, WDR23/DCAF11); a cytoplasmic scaffold module (p62/sequestosome 1, p62/SQSTM1; IQ motif-containing GTPase-activating protein 1, IQGAP1; type I phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase γ/heat shock protein 27, PIPKIγ-HSP27; peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase NIMA-interacting 1, PIN1; peptidyl-prolyl isomerase A/cyclophilin A, PPIA); a nuclear coactivator module at Neh4/5 (CREB-binding protein/p300, CBP/p300; receptor-associated coactivator 3/steroid receptor coactivator 3, RAC3/SRC-3; protein arginine methyltransferase 1/coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1, PRMT1/CARM1; Mediator complex subunit 16, MED16); and a DNA/chromatin module at Neh1 (small musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma [Maf] proteins, BACH1, and chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 6, CHD6). Mapping 22 partners onto the Neh-domain architecture identifies approximately 25 pharmacologically addressable interfaces, stratified into four translational tiers. The framework reframes NRF2 pharmacology around one principle: the most actionable target is often a partner rather than NRF2 itself, with disease context dictating the direction of modulation. We close with five testable hypotheses and a partner-code decision matrix linking disease, biomarker, and candidate target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.