Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351951›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Functional Profiling in Paralympic Water Polo Using Deep Learning, Stereo Vision, and Phase-Based Kinematic Analysis: A Pilot Study.

Andrea Zanela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrea ZanelaEnergy and Data Science Lab, ENEA "Casaccia" Research Centre, I00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5606-4175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paralympic water polo requires classification systems that reflect sport-specific functional performance under ecologically valid conditions. This pilot study proposes a task-specific kinematic profiling framework for deriving objective, biomechanically interpretable descriptors of residual motor function. Five male national-level water polo athletes-three with eligible motor impairments and two able-bodied reference participants-performed standardized sport-specific tasks comprising upright floating, vertical propulsion, unilateral passing, non-contested shooting, and contested shooting under physical opposition. Stereoscopic video, OpenPose-based three-dimensional reconstruction, and phase-based analysis were used to extract features and composite indices of postural control, propulsion capacity, upper-limb residual function, and resistance to perturbation. Automatic ball-release detection matched manual frame-level verification in all 128 analyzed ball-related trials. Within the task-specific indices, where higher scores indicate greater functional burden, core values ranged from 0.05-0.15 for upright floating, 0.29-0.68 for combined arm-and-leg vertical propulsion, and 0.040-0.148 for contested shooting across the available subject-side combinations. The profiles showed task- and side-specific differences in stabilization, propulsion, and post-contact motor reorganization. The framework uses pose estimation as a quantitative measurement tool and treats visibility interruptions as functionally meaningful events rather than noise. It is not intended to replace official classification procedures, but to provide transparent and interpretable candidate descriptors for future evidence-based classification research in Paralympic water polo.

Indexed as

functional assessmentmarkerless motion captureparalympic classificationparalympic water polophase-based analysispose estimationstereo vision

Identifiers

PMID42351951
PMCPMC13295668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.