Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351949›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Insertion Torque Characteristics of the KS 3 Implant in Weak Bone, Standardized Extraction-Socket-like, and Maxillary Sinus Simulation Models: An In Vitro Comparative Study.

Na Ri Seo, Ye-Seul Jung, Dayeon Park, Jisung Kim, Dong-Wook Han, Bongju Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Na Ri SeoProgram in Neuroscience, Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
Ye-Seul JungDental Life Science Research Institute, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
Dayeon ParkDental Life Science Research Institute, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jisung KimDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Wook HanDepartment of Cogno-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8314-1981
Bongju KimDental Life Science Research Institute, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7309-5977

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute RS-2024-00341361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis in vitro study evaluated the insertion torque characteristics of the KS 3 implant compared with the TSIII implant in standardized artificial bone models representing weak bone, extraction-socket-like reduced support, and maxillary sinus simulation conditions. MATERIALS AND

methodsA comparative in vitro study was performed using three models: a weak bone model, a standardized extraction-socket-like reduced-support model, and a maxillary sinus simulation model. Maximum and final insertion torque values were obtained from torque-depth curves. Torque-depth integrals were additionally calculated as exploratory secondary parameters. Statistical analyses were performed using Welch's

resultsThe KS 3 implant showed higher maximum and/or final insertion torque values than the TSIII implant in the weak bone, extraction-socket-like, and maxillary sinus simulation models. In the maxillary sinus model, the torque values showed directional differences according to implant type and residual bone height under the tested fixed undersized drilling protocols for both CAS drilling and bone compaction drilling. Torque-depth integral analysis provided additional information regarding cumulative insertion resistance.

conclusionsWithin the limitations of this controlled in vitro study, the KS 3 implant showed higher insertion torque values than the TSIII implant under the tested artificial bone conditions. These findings should be interpreted as in vitro insertion torque data under the tested artificial bone and drilling conditions, not as evidence of clinical superiority. In the maxillary sinus simulation model, the observed torque differences should be interpreted as the combined effect of implant macrodesign and the fixed undersized drilling protocol, rather than as an isolated macrodesign effect.

Indexed as

dental implantextraction-socket-like modelimplant macrodesigninsertion resistanceinsertion torquein vitro studymaxillary sinusweak bone

Identifiers

PMID42351949
PMCPMC13295728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.