ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Practicality of Using Pressure Sensors and Accelerometers to Quantify Hand Orthosis Compliance at Home.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Orthosis compliance monitoring provides insights into effective orthosis design and user wear time. Frequently, patient reports of orthosis use are subjective and often result in overestimation of compliance. Therefore, a tool to objectively observe whether patients wear their orthoses as instructed is vital. This study assessed the real-world practicality of using an objective compliance monitoring device with a hand orthosis. A device consisting of a pressure sensor and accelerometer was tested by ten healthy volunteers who wore a hand orthosis daily and completed a diary of their wear time and activities for a week. Sensor data obtained from the compliance monitoring device were analysed to discern each user's orthosis wear time. Differences between estimated wear time and actual wear time were insignificant. Pressure-based wear time estimations had a specificity of 99.3 ± 0.7% and a sensitivity of 80.3 ± 19.2%, whilst acceleration-derived estimations had a specificity of 94.5 ± 6.4% and a sensitivity of 73.2 ± 15.8%. This study demonstrated that orthosis compliance can be monitored outside the laboratory, and, furthermore, this device offers insights into the intensity and frequency of a user's activities and has the future potential to monitor orthosis fit and forces applied to affected joints using pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.