Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351932›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence in Embryo Selection: Current Approaches and Clinical Implications.

Lucia Maresca, Antonio D'Amato, Camilla Coianiz, Alessandra Cavalieri, Erica Vella, Francesco Gebbia, Lorena Bori, Marcos Meseguer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucia MarescaIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Antonio D'AmatoIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Camilla CoianizIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Alessandra CavalieriIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Erica VellaIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Francesco GebbiaIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Lorena BoriIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Valencia, IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Marcos MeseguerIVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Valencia, IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryo selection remains one of the main unresolved challenges in in vitro fertilization, despite major advances in assisted reproductive technologies. Conventional assessment is still largely based on morphological evaluation, which is limited by subjectivity, static observation, and the difficulty of integrating heterogeneous clinical and biological data. In recent years, artificial intelligence has emerged as a decision-support tool in embryology, enabling the analysis of large datasets derived from embryo images, morphokinetic parameters, and clinical variables. This review summarizes current approaches to artificial intelligence in embryo selection, including models based on static images and time-lapse imaging data. Machine learning and deep learning techniques are discussed, including convolutional neural networks and spatiotemporal models. The evaluation of model performance is also examined, highlighting the clinical relevance of endpoints such as time to live birth compared with traditional outcome measures. Finally, ethical and clinical implications are considered, including issues related to transparency, responsibility, human oversight, and regulation. Artificial intelligence has the potential to improve embryo selection, although further validation and standardized implementation are needed before routine clinical use.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningembryo selectionin vitro fertilizationmachine learningmorphokineticstime-lapse imaging

Identifiers

PMID42351932
PMCPMC13296236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.