ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence in Embryo Selection: Current Approaches and Clinical Implications.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation and predictive model development of AI-based non-invasive embryo selection inFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embryo selection remains one of the main unresolved challenges in in vitro fertilization, despite major advances in assisted reproductive technologies. Conventional assessment is still largely based on morphological evaluation, which is limited by subjectivity, static observation, and the difficulty of integrating heterogeneous clinical and biological data. In recent years, artificial intelligence has emerged as a decision-support tool in embryology, enabling the analysis of large datasets derived from embryo images, morphokinetic parameters, and clinical variables. This review summarizes current approaches to artificial intelligence in embryo selection, including models based on static images and time-lapse imaging data. Machine learning and deep learning techniques are discussed, including convolutional neural networks and spatiotemporal models. The evaluation of model performance is also examined, highlighting the clinical relevance of endpoints such as time to live birth compared with traditional outcome measures. Finally, ethical and clinical implications are considered, including issues related to transparency, responsibility, human oversight, and regulation. Artificial intelligence has the potential to improve embryo selection, although further validation and standardized implementation are needed before routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.