ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Enhancing Whole Slide Image Classification in Renal Cell Carcinoma via Swin Transformer-Based Multiple Instance Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) comprises histologic subtypes with distinct prognosis and treatment implications. This single-cohort study evaluated slide-level weakly supervised subtype classification for clear cell RCC (ccRCC), papillary RCC (pRCC), and chromophobe RCC (chRCC) using 928 diagnostic H&E whole-slide images (WSIs) from 928 patients in TCGA-RCC. We propose Swin-CLAM, a controlled modification of CLAM in which the conventional CNN patch encoder is replaced by an ImageNet-pretrained Swin-Tiny Transformer, while the CLAM-SB bag-level aggregation module is kept unchanged. WSIs were segmented, tiled into non-overlapping 256×256 patches at an effective 20× magnification, encoded offline, and classified using slide-level labels only. In five-fold patient-level cross-validation on TCGA-RCC, Swin-CLAM achieved a macro-averaged AUC of 0.976±0.008, an accuracy of 94.8±1.0%, and a macro-F1 of 0.940±0.012, with the largest gain observed for chRCC. Attention heatmaps and t-SNE plots were used as qualitative, exploratory analyses rather than formal evidence of interpretability. These results suggest that stronger patch-level representation can improve CLAM-based RCC subtype classification under a fixed MIL aggregator. However, the study does not establish clinical readiness, and external validation, calibration, domain-shift analysis, and expert region-level assessment are needed before practical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.