ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development and External Validation of an Explainable AHP-ML Model for Orthodontic Tooth Extraction and Anchorage Decision Support.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tooth extraction and maximum anchorage assessment are key decision points in orthodontic treatment planning, yet existing machine learning models for orthodontic decision support often lack transparency, limiting their clinical interpretability and trustworthiness. In this study, we developed and externally validated an explainable orthodontic treatment decision-support model that integrates expert-derived Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) weighting with machine learning. A diagnostic indicator framework comprising 18 orthodontic variables was established through a literature review, clinical data analysis, and two rounds of expert surveys. A retrospective cohort of 485 patients receiving fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment was used for model development and internal validation. AHP-derived composite scores were incorporated into the machine learning models for two prediction tasks, namely tooth extraction and maximum anchorage requirement, and an expert-informed fuzzy-rule score was calculated from pretreatment indicators for the maximum anchorage task to capture clinically interpretable anchorage tendencies. Model performance was evaluated using ROC-AUC, F1 score, precision, recall, PR-AUC, calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis, while SHAP was applied to interpret feature contributions. The AHP-RF extraction model and AHP-enhanced LR maximum anchorage model achieved the highest AUCs among the compared models (0.864 and 0.822, respectively), although paired DeLong tests showed no significant differences from the closest competing models. SHAP analysis identified lower lip-to-E-line distance, U1-NA, and the AHP composite score as important predictors, indicating consistency between model outputs and clinical reasoning. In the external validation cohort, the extraction model correctly classified 57 of 74 cases, and the maximum anchorage model correctly classified 24 of 29 cases, supporting the preliminary transportability of the proposed framework. These results suggest that integrating AHP-derived expert knowledge with machine learning provides an explainable and clinically interpretable decision-support model for orthodontic treatment planning, with potential value in improving standardized, evidence-informed, and patient-specific orthodontic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.