Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351916›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Development and External Validation of an Explainable AHP-ML Model for Orthodontic Tooth Extraction and Anchorage Decision Support.

Yang Yi, Xinhang Shen, Bin Wu, Yingyu Chen, Mao Liu, Bin Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang YiCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Xinhang ShenCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Bin WuCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Yingyu ChenDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Mao LiuDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Bin YanDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9169-4615

Funding

Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Department BE2022795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tooth extraction and maximum anchorage assessment are key decision points in orthodontic treatment planning, yet existing machine learning models for orthodontic decision support often lack transparency, limiting their clinical interpretability and trustworthiness. In this study, we developed and externally validated an explainable orthodontic treatment decision-support model that integrates expert-derived Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) weighting with machine learning. A diagnostic indicator framework comprising 18 orthodontic variables was established through a literature review, clinical data analysis, and two rounds of expert surveys. A retrospective cohort of 485 patients receiving fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment was used for model development and internal validation. AHP-derived composite scores were incorporated into the machine learning models for two prediction tasks, namely tooth extraction and maximum anchorage requirement, and an expert-informed fuzzy-rule score was calculated from pretreatment indicators for the maximum anchorage task to capture clinically interpretable anchorage tendencies. Model performance was evaluated using ROC-AUC, F1 score, precision, recall, PR-AUC, calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis, while SHAP was applied to interpret feature contributions. The AHP-RF extraction model and AHP-enhanced LR maximum anchorage model achieved the highest AUCs among the compared models (0.864 and 0.822, respectively), although paired DeLong tests showed no significant differences from the closest competing models. SHAP analysis identified lower lip-to-E-line distance, U1-NA, and the AHP composite score as important predictors, indicating consistency between model outputs and clinical reasoning. In the external validation cohort, the extraction model correctly classified 57 of 74 cases, and the maximum anchorage model correctly classified 24 of 29 cases, supporting the preliminary transportability of the proposed framework. These results suggest that integrating AHP-derived expert knowledge with machine learning provides an explainable and clinically interpretable decision-support model for orthodontic treatment planning, with potential value in improving standardized, evidence-informed, and patient-specific orthodontic decision-making.

Indexed as

Analytic Hierarchy Processanchorage controlexplainable machine learningorthodontic treatment decision supporttooth extraction

Identifiers

PMID42351916
PMCPMC13295870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.