ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Smartphone-Based Postoperative Wound Assessment Following Laparoscopic Surgery in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote postoperative wound assessment may help improve follow-up after laparoscopic surgery in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated the feasibility and patient satisfaction of smartphone-based postoperative wound assessment following general and bariatric laparoscopic surgery. We conducted a prospective cohort study from June 2022 to June 2023 at a public sector teaching hospital. Consecutive adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic general or bariatric procedures were invited to participate. Consenting patients submitted wound photographs and clinical queries to their surgeon within 14 days of discharge using an encrypted messaging platform. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction measured using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients requiring escalation to in-person review and the type of remote intervention provided. A total of 113 patients were enrolled. Of these, 21 (18.6%) required escalation to in-person review. Among the 92 patients managed remotely, 52 (46.0%) received reassurance only and 40 (35.4%) required medication prescription or adjustment. The mean PSQ-18 score for the cohort was 79.66 ± 11.24 (range 18-90). Satisfaction was comparable across procedure types. Smartphone-based postoperative wound assessment appears feasible and acceptable in this setting, with most postoperative concerns managed remotely and favourable patient satisfaction. Further controlled studies are needed to assess safety, diagnostic accuracy, and cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.