ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Data Quality Analyzer-Towards Optimal Radio-Frequency Frame Pair Selection for Ultrasound Elastography.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quasi-static ultrasound elastography (USE) is a promising imaging technique for detecting malignancies by assessing tissue stiffness, but its accuracy heavily depends on the quality of radio-frequency (RF) frame pairs used for displacement estimation. A major challenge in quasi-static USE is signal decorrelation, which is primarily caused by out-of-plane motion during manual probe compression, leading to unreliable displacement fields and degraded elastography images. This paper introduces a novel, displacement estimator-agnostic method for assessing RF frame pair quality by measuring the similarity between the measured post-compression RF frame and a warped version of the pre-compression frame generated using the estimated displacement field. The proposed approach employs computationally efficient metrics such as mean squared error (MSE) and correlation, demonstrating robustness against signal decorrelation in both synthetic and clinical datasets. Additionally, we present a method to simulate realistic RF data corruption via controlled out-of-plane displacements, facilitating the development of robust motion-tracking algorithms. Validation using in silico phantoms, tissue-mimicking phantoms and clinical breast cancer and liver cancer cases confirm the method's efficacy in identifying high-quality frame pairs, significantly improving strain image accuracy. Threshold values of 1.4 and 0.5 were determined for MSE and correlation, respectively, as being effective to differentiate between good vs. bad RF data frame pairs. This work lays the foundation for automated frame selection in USE, enhancing its diagnostic reliability and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.