Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351889›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Tracheal Tissue Engineering: Advances and Challenges.

Nina D Kosciuszek, Joanne Walker, Heather Wanczyk, Christine Finck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nina D KosciuszekDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
Joanne WalkerDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
Heather WanczykDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
Christine FinckDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1771-7844

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic tracheal injuries and congenital defects can be life-threatening and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Regenerating the trachea through tissue-engineered scaffolds has emerged as an innovative alternative to traditional therapies that involve tracheal resection with primary end-to-end anastomosis or tracheostomies. Despite significant advances in biomaterial developments, stem cell biology, and novel scaffold fabrication, successful clinical translation of tracheal constructs remains limited. Major challenges include inadequate vascularization following implantation, epithelial regeneration, immune reactions, mechanical instability, infection, and inability of adaptive scaffold systems to withstand long-term tissue remodeling. While general tracheal tissue-engineering techniques and the materials, cell lines, and fabrication methodologies have been previously explored, this review summarizes current advancements in tracheal tissue engineering while emphasizing the mechanobiological and translational barriers that preclude functional tracheal regeneration and clinical success. Emerging knowledge in immunomodulatory biomaterials, dynamic scaffolds, strategic vascularization methods, and adaptable constructs has paved the way for researchers to develop a tracheal scaffold that can be translated into clinical use. This review provides a critical framework that discusses the advantages and potential pitfalls of the aforementioned technologies.

Indexed as

biomaterialsregenerative medicinescaffold biomechanicstracheal regenerationtracheal tissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID42351889
PMCPMC13296255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.