Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351864›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

MaxI-Net: A 3D AI Framework for CBCT-Based Maxillofacial Defect Reconstruction and Patient-Specific Implant Generation with Biomechanical Validation.

Mamta Juneja, Maanya Kharbanda, Nitin Pandey, Agrima Sudhir, Aditya Poddar, Harleen Kaur, Prashant Prakash, Manoj Kumar Jaiswal, Prashant Jindal, Philip Breedon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mamta JunejaUniversity Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2611-9005
Maanya KharbandaUniversity Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID 0009-0007-9456-012X
Nitin PandeyUniversity Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID 0009-0008-6484-9173
Agrima SudhirUniversity Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID 0009-0002-3888-4035
Aditya PoddarUniversity Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID 0009-0000-9783-560X
Harleen KaurUniversity Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.
Prashant PrakashUniversity Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID 0009-0003-6596-2833
Manoj Kumar JaiswalOral Health Science Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Prashant JindalUniversity Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3844-3494
Philip BreedonDepartment of Engineering, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4F, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1006-0942

Funding

Nottingham Trent University International Partnership Fund (IPF) scheme and Nottingham Trent University-Panjab University Strategic Partnership Program for funding the ANSYS 15 2022 R2 software.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maxillofacial defects impair facial aesthetics and oral function, arising from trauma, tumor resection, or congenital anomalies; however, reconstruction using Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and autologous grafts remains complex and time-intensive, and is associated with donor-site morbidity. Although deep learning (DL) has advanced automated reconstruction, existing models often address isolated tasks, lack integrated multi-scale feature learning, and rely on small datasets. This study proposes the Maxillofacial Implant-generation Network (MaxI-Net), a fast, resource-efficient three-dimensional DL framework for end-to-end maxillofacial defect reconstruction and patient-specific implant generation, with a completion step of cavity filling within the assembly. The model employs a 3D encoder-bottleneck-decoder architecture integrating hybrid dilated convolutions, residual connections, squeeze-and-excitation (SE) blocks, and 3D Convolutional Block Attention Modules (CBAM) with multi-scale feature fusion. It was trained on 921 Cone Beam-Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans, augmented to 11,973 maxillary defect pairs, using Dice loss and Adam optimisation with Automatic Mixed Precision, and benchmarked against UNet, UNETR, SegResNet, and SwinUNETR. MaxI-Net achieved the following: superior Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) = 0.778; 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95) = 3.453 mm; DSC Standard Deviation (SD) = 0.094; 95% confidence interval (CI) for mean DSC: 0.775-0.782). It was statistically validated against all competing architectures via pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with significant DSC improvements confirmed across all comparators (

Indexed as

3D reconstructionartificial intelligencebiomechanical validationCBCTdeep learningfinite element analysismaxillofacial defect reconstructionmedical image analysispatient-specific implantsPEEK implants

Identifiers

PMID42351864
PMCPMC13296178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.