ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
MaxI-Net: A 3D AI Framework for CBCT-Based Maxillofacial Defect Reconstruction and Patient-Specific Implant Generation with Biomechanical Validation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maxillofacial defects impair facial aesthetics and oral function, arising from trauma, tumor resection, or congenital anomalies; however, reconstruction using Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and autologous grafts remains complex and time-intensive, and is associated with donor-site morbidity. Although deep learning (DL) has advanced automated reconstruction, existing models often address isolated tasks, lack integrated multi-scale feature learning, and rely on small datasets. This study proposes the Maxillofacial Implant-generation Network (MaxI-Net), a fast, resource-efficient three-dimensional DL framework for end-to-end maxillofacial defect reconstruction and patient-specific implant generation, with a completion step of cavity filling within the assembly. The model employs a 3D encoder-bottleneck-decoder architecture integrating hybrid dilated convolutions, residual connections, squeeze-and-excitation (SE) blocks, and 3D Convolutional Block Attention Modules (CBAM) with multi-scale feature fusion. It was trained on 921 Cone Beam-Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans, augmented to 11,973 maxillary defect pairs, using Dice loss and Adam optimisation with Automatic Mixed Precision, and benchmarked against UNet, UNETR, SegResNet, and SwinUNETR. MaxI-Net achieved the following: superior Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) = 0.778; 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95) = 3.453 mm; DSC Standard Deviation (SD) = 0.094; 95% confidence interval (CI) for mean DSC: 0.775-0.782). It was statistically validated against all competing architectures via pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with significant DSC improvements confirmed across all comparators (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.