Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351859›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?

Maria Caterina Evangelisti, Alida Mazzoli, Ivan Cabrilo, Giuseppe Perale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Caterina EvangelistiDepartment of Science and Engineering of Matter, Environment and Urban Planning (SIMAU), Università Politecnica delle Marche, UdR INSTM, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-5851-3628
Alida MazzoliDepartment of Science and Engineering of Matter, Environment and Urban Planning (SIMAU), Università Politecnica delle Marche, UdR INSTM, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9082-8407
Ivan CabriloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3875-0355
Giuseppe PeraleIndustrie Biomediche Insubri SA, Via Cantonale 67, 6805 Mezzovico-Vira, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease, myelopathy, radiculopathy, and segmental instability. Although clinical outcomes are generally favorable, pseudarthrosis remains a relevant complication, with a reported incidence ranging from 5% to 20%. In a field with no yet clear main directions, this narrative review aims at giving the reader a broad picture and a wide analysis of the recent advances in cervical spinal fusion, with particular focus on biomaterials, intervertebral cage technologies, cervical spine biomechanics and imaging methods used for fusion assessment. The literature regarding quantitative imaging parameters and emerging applications of artificial intelligence (AI) is also reviewed. Current bone grafts include autologous grafts, allografts, xenografts and polymeric grafts, while the materials for the intervertebral cages comprehend titanium, polyetheretherketone and silicon nitride, with reported fusion rates distributed in a very large range. Computed tomography (CT) remains the standard imaging modality to assess whether fusion has occurred, due to its high spatial resolution. However, the lack of shared diagnostic criteria and the significant interobserver variability continue to limit its reliability. Quantitative parameters, such as Hounsfield Unit measurements and MRI-derived bone quality scores, may contribute to a more objective evaluation, although current evidence remains heterogeneous. In parallel, AI-based imaging analysis is showing promising results for quantitative assessment and longitudinal monitoring of bone fusion; however, large prospective clinical studies are still needed to confirm its clinical applicability. In conclusion, despite advances in surgical technologies and biomaterials, radiological assessment of cervical fusion still lacks universally accepted diagnostic standards. Future AI applications may improve diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility, promoting a more standardized approach in clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebone fusionbone graftcervical spineimaging analysisneurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID42351859
PMCPMC13295550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.