ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Methane Yield, Substrate Conversion, Microbial Community Structure and Metabolic Pathways During Anaerobic Digestion of Natural Cellulosic Biomass.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three natural celluloses (softwood pulp, straw grass pulp, and degreased cotton) were used for anaerobic digestion tests to research methane yield, substrate conversion and microbial community structure, and further supplemented and clarified the metabolic pathway mechanisms of anaerobic digestion of cellulosic biomass. The results showed that natural cellulose could be significantly degraded and converted into methane by anaerobic microorganisms. The cumulative specific methane yields of wood pulp fiber (F1), straw pulp fiber (F2), and degreased cotton fiber (F3) were 373.57 ± 10.70 mL/g VS, 349.15 ± 13.20 mL/g VS and 346.16 ± 1.60 mL/g VS, respectively. The corresponding biodegradability values were 93.97%, 85.95% and 84.32%. Although the fermentation cycles in F1, F2, and F3 were identical (T95 was 12 days), the three groups exhibited distinct biogas production patterns. Metagenomic analysis indicated that F1 and F2 were dominated by the acetoclastic methanogenesis pathway, while the proportion of the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis pathway increased in F3. Meanwhile, the cell motility pathway category was significantly enriched in F3. These results supplement the existing research on the anaerobic digestion of natural cellulose and provide theoretical support for the efficient anaerobic bioconversion of natural cellulosic biomass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.