ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
First Results Comparing MLC Versus IRIS CyberKnife Collimators in Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in an Italian Oncology Institute.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in men and remains a major cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Radiotherapy is a well-established treatment modality for PCa, offering clinical outcomes comparable to surgical approaches. In recent years, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), characterized by the delivery of high radiation doses in a limited number of fractions, has been increasingly adopted as a standard approach in the treatment of prostate cancer, due to its favorable efficacy and toxicity profile. CyberKnife (CK) is one of the most commonly used hypofractionated radiotherapy techniques. This preliminary study aimed to evaluate and compare the radiation dose delivery and treatment time of CK-based SBRT using two different collimation systems: the multileaf collimator (MLC) and the IRIS variable aperture collimator, a dynamic device that adjusts its opening to simulate different circular field sizes. A total of 19 patients with low-to-intermediate-risk PCa were selected and treated at the Radiation Oncology Department of the National Cancer Institute IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale in Naples between January 2024 and January 2025. For each patient, two treatment plans were generated-one with the IRIS collimator and one with the MLC. The results demonstrated that the use of the MLC significantly reduced treatment time while maintaining dosimetric quality comparable to IRIS-based plans. These findings support the clinical benefit of MLC implementation in prostate SBRT with the CK system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.