Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351841›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

First Results Comparing MLC Versus IRIS CyberKnife Collimators in Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in an Italian Oncology Institute.

Gaetano Gagliardo, Marcello Serra, Gianluca Ametrano, Rosario Megna, Valentina d'Alesio, Francesca Buonanno, Cecilia Arrichiello, Rossella Di Franco, Valentina Borzillo, Esmeralda Scipilliti and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Gaetano GagliardoPost Graduate School in Medical Physics, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-3162-4240
Marcello SerraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Gianluca AmetranoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Rosario MegnaInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Research Council, 80145 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5716-2137
Valentina d'AlesioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Francesca BuonannoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Cecilia ArrichielloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8756-5498
Rossella Di FrancoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6918-2178
Valentina BorzilloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Esmeralda ScipillitiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3896-0392
Rocco MottarealePost Graduate School in Medical Physics, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Simona MercoglianoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Mariagabriella PuglieseDepartment of Physics "E. Pancini", University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.
Maria QuartoPost Graduate School in Medical Physics, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0119-2393
Vincenzo RavoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1414-7110
Paolo MutoFondazione Muto ETS, 80132 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in men and remains a major cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Radiotherapy is a well-established treatment modality for PCa, offering clinical outcomes comparable to surgical approaches. In recent years, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), characterized by the delivery of high radiation doses in a limited number of fractions, has been increasingly adopted as a standard approach in the treatment of prostate cancer, due to its favorable efficacy and toxicity profile. CyberKnife (CK) is one of the most commonly used hypofractionated radiotherapy techniques. This preliminary study aimed to evaluate and compare the radiation dose delivery and treatment time of CK-based SBRT using two different collimation systems: the multileaf collimator (MLC) and the IRIS variable aperture collimator, a dynamic device that adjusts its opening to simulate different circular field sizes. A total of 19 patients with low-to-intermediate-risk PCa were selected and treated at the Radiation Oncology Department of the National Cancer Institute IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale in Naples between January 2024 and January 2025. For each patient, two treatment plans were generated-one with the IRIS collimator and one with the MLC. The results demonstrated that the use of the MLC significantly reduced treatment time while maintaining dosimetric quality comparable to IRIS-based plans. These findings support the clinical benefit of MLC implementation in prostate SBRT with the CK system.

Indexed as

CyberKnifeIRISMLCprostate cancerStereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Identifiers

PMID42351841
PMCPMC13296121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.