Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351651›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2026

Optical, Tomographic, and Mass Spectrometry Imaging Methods for Burn Wounds: Capabilities, Limitations, and Clinical Potential.

Dmitry P Krylov, Dariya M Badanina, Dmitry S Kozlov, Peter S Timashev, Daria S Kuznetsova, Artem M Mozherov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dmitry P KrylovInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya Str., 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0345-9875
Dariya M BadaninaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya Str., 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3761-3746
Dmitry S KozlovInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya Str., 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-8359
Peter S TimashevInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya Str., 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Daria S KuznetsovaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya Str., 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Artem M MozherovInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya Str., 119991 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 25-25-00623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review systematizes the principal methods for imaging and morphological analysis of burn wounds, ranging from light, electron, and fluorescence microscopy to tomographic techniques and mass spectrometry imaging. Light microscopy with histological staining and immunohistochemistry remains the morphological gold standard, enabling visualization of the zones of coagulation, stasis, and hyperemia, as well as molecular characterization of inflammation, angiogenesis, and fibrosis. Electron microscopy allows the study of the ultrastructure of cells and the extracellular matrix at nanometer resolution. Among optical methods, wide-field indocyanine green angiography demonstrates high accuracy in burn depth stratification, whereas fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy assesses cellular metabolism without exogenous labels. Among tomographic techniques, high-frequency ultrasound is the most accessible bedside modality with submillimeter resolution, permitting evaluation of tissue anatomy, perfusion, and biomechanical properties. magnetic resonance imaging is limited by its high cost and long examination time, while mass spectrometry imaging is used solely for research purposes. For clinical practice, the optimal combination is high-frequency ultrasound and wide-field fluorescence imaging. All methods retain high relevance for experimental research, enabling the validation of novel therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

elastographyfluorescence lifetime imaging microscopyfluorescence microscopyhistopathological analysisimmunohistochemical analysisindocyanine green angiographymagnetic resonance imagingmass spectrometry-based imagingmultimodal imagingthermal injuryultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42351651
PMCPMC13297623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.