ReviewBiomedicines2026
Optical, Tomographic, and Mass Spectrometry Imaging Methods for Burn Wounds: Capabilities, Limitations, and Clinical Potential.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review systematizes the principal methods for imaging and morphological analysis of burn wounds, ranging from light, electron, and fluorescence microscopy to tomographic techniques and mass spectrometry imaging. Light microscopy with histological staining and immunohistochemistry remains the morphological gold standard, enabling visualization of the zones of coagulation, stasis, and hyperemia, as well as molecular characterization of inflammation, angiogenesis, and fibrosis. Electron microscopy allows the study of the ultrastructure of cells and the extracellular matrix at nanometer resolution. Among optical methods, wide-field indocyanine green angiography demonstrates high accuracy in burn depth stratification, whereas fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy assesses cellular metabolism without exogenous labels. Among tomographic techniques, high-frequency ultrasound is the most accessible bedside modality with submillimeter resolution, permitting evaluation of tissue anatomy, perfusion, and biomechanical properties. magnetic resonance imaging is limited by its high cost and long examination time, while mass spectrometry imaging is used solely for research purposes. For clinical practice, the optimal combination is high-frequency ultrasound and wide-field fluorescence imaging. All methods retain high relevance for experimental research, enabling the validation of novel therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.