Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351583›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Operational Validity in Decentralized Molecular Point-of-Care Diagnostics: A Human Factors Engineering Perspective.

Moustafa Kardjadj

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Moustafa Kardjadjdicentra, Toronto, ON M4W 3E2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9537-2274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid expansion of molecular point-of-care (POC) diagnostics into decentralized settings, including emergency departments, retail pharmacies, and home environments, has shifted the burden of diagnostic performance from laboratory professionals to heterogeneous, often non-expert users. While traditional evaluation frameworks focus on analytical and clinical validity, they often overlook the impact of human-system interactions on real-world reliability. This review introduces the concept of Operational Validity: the ability of a diagnostic system to preserve its intended performance when operated by intended users within the constraints of real-world workflows and environments. To establish a rigorous foundation for this concept, this study provides a critical comparative analysis contrasting Operational Validity against traditional clinical evaluation dimensions (analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility) and post-market metrics. While existing literature outlines isolated usability principles, the significance of this study lies in its synthesis of these fragmented concepts into a formalized, lifecycle-based "Operational Validity" framework that explicitly maps the causal mechanisms connecting initial user interaction directly to downstream clinical outcomes. By synthesizing international standards (IEC 62366-1) alongside the newly finalized May 2026 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance on the Content of Human Factors Information in Medical Device Marketing Submissions, we examine how human factors engineering (HFE) and usability engineering serve as the methodological foundation for operational validity. We analyze the specific complexities of molecular workflows, identify key parameters of use-related failure modes in pre-analytical and interpretation stages, and detail the mandatory role of iterative formative and final summative usability testing in mitigating these risks. Finally, we propose a lifecycle-based approach to HFE that integrates design, simulated-use validation, and post-market surveillance. Establishing operational validity is essential to ensure that the high analytical sensitivity of molecular POC platforms translates into consistent clinical utility across the full spectrum of decentralized care.

Indexed as

decentralized testinghuman factors engineeringmolecular point-of-careoperational validityusability engineering

Identifiers

PMID42351583
PMCPMC13298356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.