Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351291›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2026

Whole metagenome sequencing: not deep enough for complete microbial function recovery.

Jia Liu, Modupe Oluseun Coker, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters, Oluwaseun Peter, Nosakhare Lawrence Idemudia, Nicolas F Schlecht, Ozoemene Obuekwe, Fidelis E Eki-Udoko, Yana Bromberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 16S rRNA sequence captures microbial functional potential.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jia LiuDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. jliu80@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7910-1709
Modupe Oluseun CokerDepartment of Basic and Translational Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-7953
Nosayaba Osazuwa-PetersDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1390-9753
Oluwaseun PeterInstitute of Human Virology Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.
Nosakhare Lawrence IdemudiaMedical Laboratory Services, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
Nicolas F SchlechtDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2482-244X
Ozoemene ObuekweDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
Fidelis E Eki-UdokoDepartment of Child Health, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
Yana BrombergDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. yana.bromberg@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8351-0844

Funding

HPV, HIV and Oral Microbiota Interplay in Nigerian Youth (HOMINY)R01DE032216 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MODUPE COKER, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters · 2022 to 2026
$4.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE032216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole metagenome shotgun sequencing (WMS) is widely used to profile microbial function. However, technical variability in sequencing and analysis often obscures true biological patterns. Large-scale studies are particularly susceptible to batch effects, such as differences in sequencing depth and platform and annotation strategies, as well as sample-to-flow-cell assignments. However, the relative effects of these factors on functional inference in such studies have yet to be systematically evaluated. We analyzed oral-rinse WMS data from 671 Nigerian youths aged 9-18, sequenced on two Illumina platforms. Microbial molecular functionality encoded in these data was annotated using the mi-faser/Fusion pipeline, to capture the broad functional repertoire, and HUMAnN 3/EC numbers pipeline to characterize curated enzymatic activities. We then quantified how technical factors and batch effects shaped the recovery of microbial functionality.

resultsThree findings of our work were most salient. First, we observed that the choice of annotation strategy traded off between breadth and specificity of functional coverage. Second, we found that low-prevalence functions were disproportionately lost at shallow sequencing depths, indicating that in, e.g., case-control studies with few representatives of the minor class, sequencing depth could critically impact study resolution. Finally, using our newly developed model relating sequencing depth to functional recovery, we demonstrated that increasing sequencing depth does not directly or proportionally improve functional recall. That is, at as little as 10% of this study's sequencing depth, 30% of the estimated complete microbiome functional repertoire was detectable. However, even at the full depth used in this study, we were only able to recover an estimated 60% of that complete functional repertoire. We further showed that despite biomes differences in functional diversity and host contamination levels (e.g., soil, fecal), incomplete functional recovery at commonly used sequencing depths was consistently observed.

conclusionsTogether, these findings and our depth-to-function mapping framework provide practical guidelines for the design and interpretation of WMS studies. Coordinating sequencing depth planning with annotation strategy, experimental design, and rigorous batch control is thus essential for robust detection of microbial functions and for ensuring reproducible microbiome insights. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

BacteriaMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaChildFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence Analysis, DNAShotgun SequencingBatch effectsFunctionRead depthWhole metagenome shotgun sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42351291
PMCPMC13556019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.