Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351283›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2026

Bat skin microbiome and the association of ecoregion and bat species that impacted isolation of members with bioactivity against Pseudogymnoascus destructans.

Paris S Salazar-Hamm, María-José Romero-Jiménez, Nicole A Caimi, Kevin R Amses, Jennifer J Marshall Hathaway, Debbie C Buecher, Ernest W Valdez, Lindsay K Caesar, Andrea Porras-Alfaro, Diana E Northup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paris S Salazar-HammDepartment of Biology, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico, USA. paris.salazar-hamm@nmt.edu.
María-José Romero-JiménezDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Nicole A CaimiDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Kevin R AmsesDepartment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Jennifer J Marshall HathawayDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Debbie C BuecherBuecher Biological Consulting, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Ernest W ValdezU.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Lindsay K CaesarDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.
Andrea Porras-AlfaroDirectorate for Biological Sciences, National Science Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Diana E NorthupDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. dnorthup@unm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiome constituents can serve as a primary defense against vertebrate pathogens. This may be crucial to the protection of North American bats who have been devastated over the last two decades by the fungal pathogen, Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd), which causes white-nose syndrome (WNS). The objectives of this study were to isolate members of the external microbiome of bats post-hibernation in Arizona and New Mexico before the arrival of WNS, to identify those bacteria with bioactivity against Pd, and to determine the variables associated with antifungal strains.

resultsIn this study we isolated 2,936 bacteria from the fur and skin of 314 bats across 12 bat species at 6 sites across New Mexico and Arizona from 2013 to 2016. Selective media were used to promote the isolation of Actinomycetota (2,594 isolates, 88.4%), particularly species of Streptomyces (2,045 isolates, 69.7%) known for their bioactivity. Although Actinomycetota isolation was targeted, this collection includes representatives from Pseudomonadota (Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Proteobacteria), Bacillota, and Bacteroidota phyla also common to the bat microbiome. A bi-layer challenge assay performed on 1,089 isolates identified 61 bat-associated bacteria with activity against Pd. These results were pooled with efforts by Hamm et al. [1] to determine what metrics impacted isolation of bacteria that inhibit Pd (n = 97). Ecoregion and bat species were determinant variables associated with Pd inhibition.

conclusionsThis study represents, to our best knowledge, the largest culture collection of bacteria from bats' skin and fur before the impact of WNS. We identified bacteria with antifungal activity against Pd and found significant associations of bioactive strains with bat species and ecoregions.

Indexed as

ActinomycetotaAntifungalMicrobiomeStreptomycesWhite-nose disease (WND)White-nose syndrome (WNS)

Identifiers

PMID42351283
PMCPMC13545805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.