Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351270›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

Global population structures and demographic history of Suillus luteus, a pine co-introduced ectomycorrhizal fungus associated with exotic forestry and invasion.

Yi-Hong Ke, Anna Bazzicalupo, Joske Ruytinx, Lotus Lofgren, Thomas Bruns, Sara Branco, Brian Looney, Dai Hirose, Leho Tedersoo, Ursula Peintner and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Yi-Hong KeThe Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8435-082X
Anna BazzicalupoRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, TW9 3AB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5845-9517
Joske RuytinxResearch Groups of Transdisciplinary Agrifood Studies, Department of Bio-engineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050, Brussel, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5835-3704
Lotus LofgrenThe Department of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0632-102X
Thomas BrunsUniversity and Jepson Herbarium, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-8669
Sara BrancoIntegrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, 80204, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9890-933X
Brian LooneyThe Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5342-9909
Dai HiroseSchool of Pharmacy, Nihon University, Chiba, 274-8555, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4990-3959
Leho TedersooMycology and Microbiology Center, University of Tartu, Tartu, 50409, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1635-1249
Ursula PeintnerDepartment of Microbiology, University Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5388-4266
J Alejandro RojasDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-5963
Hui-Ling LiaoNorth Florida Research and Education Center, Quincy, FL, 32351, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1648-3444
Jonathan M PlettHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, 2753, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-8146
Ian C AndersonHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, 2753, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-163X
Anna LipzenU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-9329
Alan KuoU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3514-3530
Kerrie BarryU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8999-6785
Igor GrigorievThe Department of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3136-8903
Jason D HoeksemaDepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, 38677, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2338-8442
Peter G KennedyDepartment of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2615-3892
Nhu H NguyenDepartment of Tropical Plants and Soil Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8276-7042
Rytas VilgalysThe Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8299-3605

Funding

Division of Environmental Biology DEB 1554181Division of Environmental Biology DEB 2332726Division of Integrative Organismal Systems IOS-PBI 2029168Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek FWO-G082621NMichigan State University Hatch MICL03028Office of International Science and Engineering OISE 1953299Office of Science DE-AC02-05CH11231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human colonization since the 19th century has resulted in the global spread of pines beyond their original northern boreal distribution. Although the introduction history of pines is documented through historical records, little is known about the introduction history of their ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi, which are critical symbionts for the survival and invasion of pines. Using Suillus luteus as an example, whole genomes of 208 individuals collected across native and introduced ranges were sequenced to reveal the introduction history of pine co-introduced ECM fungi. Population genomics analyses showed that all introductions originated from Europe. With the exception of North America, introduced populations were genetically differentiated from the European population, with varying magnitudes of population expansion in different introduced regions. Genetic variation within the native European population followed isolation by distance, but not in the introduced range, highlighting the disparity in the spatial-genetic patterns of native vs exotic habitats. The spread of S. luteus is mediated by human activities accompanying pine introductions, with its demographic history linked to forestry practices. The spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns observed in S. luteus offer insight into the population genetics of a widely introduced ECM fungus and are likely applicable to other pine co-introduced ECM fungi.

Indexed as

BasidiomycotaForestryIntroduced SpeciesMycorrhizaePinusDemographyEuropeGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGeographybiological invasiondemographic modelingectomycorrhizal fungiexotic pinepopulation geneticsSuillus luteus

Identifiers

PMID42351270
PMCPMC13443149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.