SynthesisJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
T2-sparing vs T2-including sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: a meta-analysis on compensatory sweating.
Synthesis in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSympathectomy is the definitive treatment for primary hyperhidrosis, offering high success rates. However, compensatory sweating (CS) remains a frequent and distressing complication. The level of ganglionic resection, particularly the inclusion of T2, may influence CS incidence, but evidence remains inconsistent.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to July 2025, to identify studies comparing T2-sparing versus T2-including sympathectomy for primary hyperhidrosis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. For outcomes with significant heterogeneity, leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed.
resultsEleven studies involving 3,090 patients were included. Of these, 47.2% underwent T2-sparing sympathectomy and 52.8% underwent T2-including procedures. T2-sparing sympathectomy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of overall CS (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.21-0.67; p = 0.0009; I2 = 65%) and severe CS (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.28-0.64; p < 0.0001; I2 = 19%). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent results across both randomized and non-randomized studies, as well as across short-term (≤ 12 months) and long-term (> 12 months) follow-up periods. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings. No publication bias was detected.
conclusionsT2-sparing sympathectomy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of CS. These findings support avoiding T2 when feasible to minimize postoperative morbidity. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.