ArticleBMC health services research2026
An exploration of the organizational performance of a care pathway applied to ambulatory surgery: a systems approach.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmbulatory surgery is experiencing significant growth in France and OECD countries, accompanied by a profound transformation of care pathways. Existing performance evaluation approaches remain fragmented, limited to a single dimension, an isolated segment of the pathway, or the perspective of a single category of stakeholders. A systemic and multidimensional approach, grounded in real-world practices, is lacking.
objectiveAs part of research aimed at developing a framework for evaluating the organizational performance of care pathways in ambulatory surgery, the primary objective of this study was to identify the dimensions and sub-dimensions of this performance, and then to explore their interactions within a systemic approach.
methodA qualitative study using non-participant observation was conducted in nine French healthcare facilities (public and private, with varied organizational models), covering the entire in-hospital pathway. The observations utilized three analytical perspectives: the facility, patients and their pathways, and professional practices. The data were analyzed using an inductive approach inspired by grounded theory (descriptive, axial, and matrix coding), with double coding and thematic saturation achieved at the seventh facility.
resultsThe analysis identified 103 codes, grouped into 24 sub-dimensions and then synthesized into five dimensions of organizational performance: flow management, working conditions, professional-patient communication, clinical outcomes, and patient experience/satisfaction. No sub-dimension contributes to only a single dimension; the sub-dimensions are part of an interdependent system. Some emerge as priority cross-cutting levers, notably the quality of the professional-patient relationship (N = 544), the organization of the in-hospital pathway (N = 365), and the information provided to the patient (N = 457).
conclusionsThis research provides an empirical basis for the development of a multidimensional evaluation framework that can be applied to other healthcare systems and used to develop performance evaluation tools at both the institutional level and the macro level by regulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.