ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
Community perspectives on access to healthcare for the Rama indigenous people, Nicaragua: the utility of Cultural Safety outside high-income countries.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indigenous Peoples worldwide experience significantly worse health outcomes than people who are non-Indigenous. The challenges they face are generally more severe in low- and middle-income countries, but most research has focused on high-income countries, mainly Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the USA. This study aimed to help redress this imbalance by focusing on access to healthcare for the Rama indigenous people, a community of around 2,000 people who live on the Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua. The data for this study were drawn from face-to-face and online interviews with Rama and non-Rama participants, conducted during two periods: one in spring 2016 and one in January 2024. In total, 49 participants were interviewed, 28 of whom were female. The research found that although government healthcare was nominally free, limited supplies, equipment shortages, and staff constraints pushed many Rama people to rely on expensive private care. This could strain household incomes, which were already under greater pressure than other local, non-indigenous households. Travel to tertiary care centres was costly and difficult because of the distance between Rama communities and where most regional healthcare centres were based. This was one contributory factor that Rama families often took into account when making decisions about when and where to seek healthcare. The language barrier between Rama service users and non-Rama health professionals, perceived discrimination, and non-Rama health professionals' lack of local knowledge further discouraged care-seeking; and there were many barriers for Rama people who wished to train as health professionals. Although Traditional Medicine was valued, its use declined between 2016 and 2024. Progress towards culturally safe healthcare for the Rama will be difficult; supporting more Rama people to become medically trained and promoting longer-term placements in Rama communities for trained health professionals could help in its achievement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.