SynthesisBMC palliative care2026
Factors associated with psychological distress among end-of-life care volunteers: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.
Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVolunteers are integral to end-of-life care, providing emotional, spiritual, and practical support. However, they often face emotionally demanding situations with limited training and supervision compared to professionals. Given the limited and fragmented literature on psychological distress experienced by end-of-life volunteers, this systematic review aimed to synthesise existing quantitative and qualitative evidence to identify factors associated with psychological distress.
methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review including qualitative and quantitative evidence. Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database and Web of Science) were searched for original studies, complemented by citation and reference searches. Study quality was assessed using the Qualsyst tool. Quantitative findings were synthesised using an algorithm to evaluate evidence strength, and qualitative data were integrated through thematic meta-synthesis.
resultsTwenty-six studies (20 quantitative and 6 qualitative studies) met inclusion criteria. Quantitative research examined 49 volunteer-related, 18 service-related, and one volunteer-patient-interaction-related factor associated with anxiety, death anxiety, depression, burnout, and/or perceived stress. Moderate-strength evidence indicated that death anxiety was negatively associated with better health and well-being but unrelated to age, volunteer experience, or training. Furthermore, depression was negatively associated with volunteer training. Qualitative evidence was scarce, but highlighted additional patient-, interaction-, and service-level mechanisms.
conclusionThis review identifies a small, methodologically diverse evidence base on factors associated with psychological distress in end-of-life care volunteers. Quantitative evidence suggests a potential protective association between training and depression, though substantial heterogeneity limits firm conclusions. Limited qualitative evidence revealed patient-, interaction- and service-level factors that are rarely captured quantitatively. Robust theory-guided longitudinal studies are needed to better understand distress and resilience in this under-researched group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.