ArticleBMC medicine2026
Multimodal deep learning-based prediction of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury via anatomical imaging and spatial dose: A multicenter study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo develop and validate a multimodal deep learning model for pre-treatment prediction of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury (RTLI), and to evaluate its generalizability across nasopharyngeal carcinoma-endemic and non-endemic regions.
methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, 6847 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma from five institutions in southern and northern China were included. A 3D ResNet-based multimodal deep learning model integrating planning CT images, spatial dose distribution maps, dosimetric variables, and clinical factors was developed and validated, and subsequently evaluated in internal and multiple external test cohorts. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index and compared with reduced-modality deep learning models, a dosiomics risk model, and conventional reference models. Model interpretability was explored using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM).
resultsThe multimodal deep learning model demonstrated robust predictive performance, achieving concordance indices of 0.817, 0.825, 0.767, 0.901, and 0.815 across the internal, three southern external, and northern external test cohorts, respectively, and significantly outperforming all comparator models (all P < 0.001). Incremental performance gains were observed with multimodal integration, and CT imaging improved performance in the deep learning framework but not in the dosiomics risk model. The model enabled reliable identification of patients at high risk of RTLI. Grad-CAM visualization links model outputs to spatial dose-tissue interactions to guide radiotherapy plan optimization.
conclusionsMultimodal deep learning integrating anatomical imaging, spatial dose information, and clinical context enables accurate and generalizable pre-treatment prediction of RTLI across diverse regions. Spatially interpretable outputs further support individualized risk stratification and establish a biologically and dosimetrically informed foundation for risk-adapted radiotherapy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.