ArticleBMC medical education2026
Optimizing university course timetabling for metaverse integration: a human-centered decision model in medical education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUniversity Course Timetabling Problems (UCTTP) in medical schools have become more complex with the integration of metaverse technologies such as virtual and augmented reality. These immersive environments enhance medical education but also introduce new scheduling constraints involving specialized hardware, virtual classrooms, and simulation sessions. Addressing this need, the present study develops a human-centered (faculty-focused) optimization framework that aligns scheduling decisions with instructors' behavioral intentions to adopt metaverse-based teaching methods.
methodsA binary integer linear programming model was formulated to jointly assign regular and metaverse courses while satisfying institutional constraints. Professor-specific behavioral intention weights were derived using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) informed by constructs identified through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Two heuristic approaches-the Greedy Reassignment and Assignment for Professor Equity (GRAPE) and Simulated Annealing (SA)-were developed to solve the model. The parameters of SA were optimized using the Taguchi Design of Experiments method. Computational experiments were conducted on 45 synthetically generated instances of varying sizes.
resultsThe results show that the GRAPE algorithm provides rapid feasible solutions, whereas the SA algorithm yields higher solution quality, particularly for large and complex problem instances. The Taguchi analysis indicated that the cooling rate and number of iterations significantly influence performance, achieving an excellent model fit (R
conclusionsThis study introduces the first optimization framework that integrates behavioral intention modeling into course timetabling for metaverse-based education. The proposed approach enables institutions to allocate metaverse courses to instructors who demonstrate higher readiness to adopt immersive teaching technologies. These findings support the design of adaptive, human-centered scheduling systems aligned with faculty readiness. The current framework focuses on faculty-level behavioral factors; student-related dimensions, such as technological access and cohort preparedness, are acknowledged as important areas for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.