Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351145›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Machine learning-driven prediction of healthcare resource trends and optimal allocation strategies: a data-driven approach.

Mingkai Zhao, Shiqi Pan, Yuanming Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingkai ZhaoHenan Medical University, Henan, China.
Shiqi PanHenan Medical University, Henan, China.
Yuanming SongHenan Medical University, Henan, China. sym@xxmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the advancement of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment systems in China, primary healthcare institutions have become pivotal in delivering basic medical services. Accurate prediction and optimal allocation of healthcare resources are indispensable for improving service quality and ensuring the effective operation of the healthcare system.

methodsThis research utilizes the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) to optimize the hyperparameters of Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models, aiming to enhance their predictive performance for primary healthcare resource planning.

resultsThe findings demonstrate that the SSA-LSTM model significantly outperforms the SSA-BPNN model. Specifically, in predicting the number of primary healthcare institutions, the SSA-LSTM model reduces the root mean squared error (RMSE) by 45% (from 1.429 to 0.78765) and the mean absolute error (MAE) by 36.4% (from 0.99575 to 0.63306) on the test set. Across all prediction tasks, including personnel quantity and total health costs, the SSA-LSTM model achieves an average RMSE reduction of 23.5% and MAE reduction of 17.1% on the test set compared with SSA-BPNN. Similar improvements are evident in the training set, with RMSE and MAE decreasing by 19.2% and 15.4%, respectively.

conclusionThe SSA-LSTM model offers robust data-driven decision support for healthcare policymakers. Its superior predictive accuracy enables dynamic adjustments to resource allocation, which is essential for bridging regional disparities in China's primary healthcare system. By accurately forecasting key healthcare indicators, the model facilitates optimized staffing, institutional planning, and budget distribution, thereby laying a solid foundation for evidence-based resource optimization and enhancing the overall efficiency and equity of primary care services.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPrimary Health CareResource AllocationAlgorithmsChinaHumansLong Short Term MemoryNeural Networks, ComputerPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsCorrelationInfluencing FactorsMachine LearningPrimary Healthcare Institutions

Identifiers

PMID42351145
PMCPMC13560285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.