ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices on injection site complications among small ruminant animal health providers in Kumasi, Ghana.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInjection-site complications are a poorly recognised problem in small ruminant production in Ghana. The improper injection can lead to tissue damage, abscesses, fibrosis, drug residues, lower meat quality and carcass condemnation, which can cause economic and public health issues. Veterinarians are legally qualified to give injections, but in practice, para-veterinarians and animal herders often do so, as they are in close contact with livestock and are often responsible for immediate animal care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of animal health providers on injection-site complications in Kumasi, Ghana.
methodsA comparative cross-sectional study was carried out among 230 respondents including veterinarians (59), para-veterinarians (18), animal herders (143) and meat handlers (10) with a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were used to collect and analyse data on knowledge, attitudes, anatomical injection-site preferences and injection practices. Retrospective abattoir records from January to August 2025 were also reviewed to determine the prevalence and distribution of injection-site lesions in slaughtered small ruminants.
resultsOccupation, age, gender, years of experience, and formal training were significantly associated with the level of knowledge (p < 0.05). Veterinarians had the highest awareness of injection-site complications and correct anatomical injection sites, whereas animal herders had lower awareness, especially about tissue necrosis, contamination-related infections, and improper drug absorption. The neck area was the most common site for intramuscular injection by veterinarians, while the thigh and gluteal muscles were the most common sites for para-veterinarians and animal herders. A total of 100 injection-site lesions were found in 43,483 slaughtered animals during abattoir inspection, with lesions mainly located in the thigh area. There was a significant association between formal training and positive attitudes with good injection practices (p < 0.05).
conclusionThere were significant differences in knowledge and practices about injection-site complications among animal health providers in Kumasi. Injection administration by para-veterinarians and herders, and inappropriate injection-site selection, may be factors in the lesions seen during meat inspection. Injection safety, meat quality and animal welfare can be enhanced through targeted training and inclusive veterinary extension programs that engage all livestock handlers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.