ArticleBMC medical education2026
Acceptance and use of GenAI among medical and health sciences students in Saudi Arabia: an extended TAM study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly used by medical and health profession students. Despite this trend, most existing evidence remains descriptive, with limited theory-driven work explaining how students' evaluations translate into intention and actual use in high-stakes learning environments. This study investigated the acceptance and actual use of GenAI among medical and health profession students in Saudi Arabia using a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). A cross-sectional survey was conducted across multiple public and private Saudi tertiary institutions, yielding 505 valid responses for descriptive analyses and 494 users for confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM). The study tested the core TAM relationships among perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward use, behavioral intention, and actual use together with contextual factors such as social influence, trust, and perceived risk. Most core TAM relationships were supported: perceived ease of use strongly predicted perceived usefulness, perceived usefulness predicted both attitude and behavioral intention, and behavioral intention strongly predicted actual use. Perceived ease of use showed a small but significant negative association with attitude. Social influence and trust positively predicted behavioral intention, and trust also positively predicted perceived usefulness. Perceived risk was not significantly associated with behavioral intention and showed only a weak association with attitude. These findings indicate an intention-driven pattern of GenAI adoption grounded primarily in perceived educational value and reinforced by trust and social norms, while risk awareness appears to coexist with selective, self-regulated engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.